Immigrant naturalisation in Switzerland is often characterised by a generally restrictive approach, yet with substantial variation in policies due to the complex multi-level naturalisation procedure: ordinary naturalisation is based on a three-level decision (municipality/commune, canton, and confederation) with a wide range of different procedures (restrictive or almost liberal) at the municipality level (Wanner, Piguet 2002), which can lead to different outcomes for the foreigner depending of his/her place of residence, and also citizenship.
At the beginning of this century, discriminatory practices in some communes of central Switzerland have been publicised in the media and highlighted in scholarly research (Hainmueller & Hangartner, 2013). In order to document the differences in the municipal practices, standardised naturalisation rates were published in 2000 (Piguet and Wanner, 2000) and updated in 2012 (Wanner and Steiner, 2012).
For policy makers and persons in charge of the naturalisation at the municipality level, it is important to be able to compare the practices and naturalisation rates of their municipality with other neighbouring communes, cantons or the whole country. To do so, however, naturalisation rates should be comparable, i.e. they should take into account the basic characteristics of the foreign population of the municipality. In particular, a municipality with a large number of young foreigners born in Switzerland will, all other things being equal, have more naturalisations than the neighbouring municipality, which is mainly composed of recently arrived migrants.
Therefore, standardised naturalisation rates were developed in order to compute the number of naturalisations (in %) for a « standard » population that has a specific structure in terms of age, duration of residence in Switzerland and place of birth. Standardisation is justified by the strong influence of those variables on the propensity to be naturalised (Kitagawa 1964; Althauser & Wigler, 1972). So, the rates we computed considered the hypothetical number of naturalisations if every Swiss municipality presents the same demographic structure, which was established in 2000 using the structure of the foreign population on that time (Piguet and Wanner, 2000).
Recently, those publications were updated and rates were made available on a web page at the University of Geneva, available in French, German and Italian.
Visitors of this website can find information on crude and standardised naturalisation by population size of municipalities in the period 1992-2017. These numbers are visualised in Figure 1 for the period 2011-2017, which also reflects the impact of standardisation over the pattern observed on the naturalisation crude rates.
Moreover, web visitors can explore interactive maps with crude and standardised naturalisation by municipality. Figure 2 provides data on standardised naturalisation rates for the period 2011-17. The pop-up window included for each municipality contains information about the name of the municipality, the rate value, the absolute number of ordinary naturalisations (when there were more than five due to anonymity requirements) and the three main nationalities of individual accessing the Swiss citizenship.
For those who could be interested in learning how to create this sort of interactive maps, and example with the standardised rates for the period 2011-2017 as well as the necessary shapefiles of Switzerland (by communes and cantons) and the annotated R code for creating the maps can be found here.
Althauser, R. P., & Wigler, M. (1972). Standardization and Component Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 1(1), 97–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912417200100105
Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2013). Who gets a Swiss passport? A natural experiment in immigrant discrimination. American political science review, 107(1), 159-187.
Kitagawa, E. (1964). Standardized Comparisons in Population Research, Demography, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1964), pp. 296-315