Re-elected Orban calls for autonomy for the Hungarians abroad

Upon his formal reelection as a prime Minister, Victor Orban stated that he would continue his policies of uniting the nation “beyond the borders” and claimed that “Hungarians living in the Carpathian basin are entitled to have dual citizenship, are entitled to community rights, and also autonomy.” During his previous term of office, he had already granted Hungarian citizenship to many of them and their votes contributed to his landslide victory in the last month’s elections. According to Reuters, he has pointed to the 200,000 ethnic Hungarians in Ukraine, “entitled to Hungarian citizenship and also the right to self-administration.” Ukraine, as Slovakia, does not accept that its citizens adopt a foreign nationality. Orban’s proposal is therefore bound to be controversial.

Read more details by Reuters, Euronews, and Budapest Business Journal

Read our earlier news on naturalisations of ethnic Hungarians abroad and on their role in the recent elections here

 

Read More …

Statelessness Determination in the Netherlands

The Netherlands lacks an adequate mechanism for the identification of stateless persons, and is therefore not complying with its international obligations in the field of statelessness. Contrary to the position of the Dutch government, the existing procedures that stateless persons Read More …

Austrian Ministers propose to denaturalize Austrian nationals fighting in Syria

By EUDO CITIZENSHIP expert Gerd Valchars

Following a report of an allegedly large number of jihadists from Austria in the Syrian civil war (an estimated 80-100 persons), the Austrian Minister of the Interior, the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Integration and the Minister of Justice, all three belonging to the conservative People’s Party (ÖVP), announced plans to strip such fighters of their Austrian citizenship. As a first step, the citizenship act would have to be amended, as the current provisions (articles 32 and 33) only provide for a loss of citizenship by persons serving in the public  or military service of a foreign country. The planned amendment would extend this to “persons participating in armed conflicts in a foreign armed group” (“Personen, die sich an bewaffneten Konflikten einer ausländischen bewaffneten Gruppierung beteiligen”) if these persons are dual nationals, as statelessness would be in contradiction to international law. Nonetheless, as a second step the ministers consider extending deprivation also to persons with only Austrian citizenship. Acknowledging the potential conflict with international law they intend to “start discussions with the relevant international institutions”. There seems to be some confusion as to which these relevant international institutions could be since the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Integration mentioned “the EU-level” but neither  the UN nor the Council of Europe, which are the International Organisation that have actually adopted the relevant conventions. The Minister of the Interior explained the motivation for the plan as follows: “Austrian citizenship is of great value and must not abused by Islamists” (“Das hohe Gut der österreichischen Staatsbürgerschaft darf durch Islamisten nicht missbraucht werden”).

Until now the Austria law (Art. 32) provides the possibility to deprive a person of his or her nationality if such person enters, on his own free will, the military service of a foreign state. In these cases even statelessness is accepted as Austria declared reservations in this respect when ratifying the UN Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness in 1972. A second provision (Art. 33) allows for withdrawal of citizenship if the behaviour of a person employed by a foreign state seriously damages the interests or the reputation of the Austrian Republic.

Further measures in the Ministers’ „five point action plan“ consist of withdrawing protection status from refugees fighting in armed conflicts; denying minors the right to leave the EU without the consent of their parents; and creating a “de-radicalisation hotline”.

The proposed measures would need consent by the co-ruling Social Democrats.

 

Read more in Die Presse, ORF and Krone 

Read a critical commentary regarding the populist aspect of these planned measures in Der Standard. 

Compare with the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness, New York, 30 August 1961.

 

Read More …