Enfranchising the disenfranchised: should refugees receive political rights in liberal democracies?

Should refugees receive political rights in liberal democracies? The author of this article argues that they should. Refugees are special – at least when it comes to claims towards democratic inclusion. They lack exit options and are significantly impacted by decisions made in liberal democracies. Enfranchisement is a matter of urgency to them and should occur on a national level. But what justifies the democratic inclusion of refugees? The author draws on the all-subjected principle in arguing that all those subjected to rule in a political unit should have a say in such rule. He shows that refugees cannot be denied democratic inclusion based on the argument that transients should be excluded from participation. Refugees are not transients. Finally, the author shows that naturalisation is not a prerequisite for enfranchisement. Political rights and citizenship can be had independently of each other. Refugees, then, should be nationally enfranchised as soon as they receive refugee status.

Felix Bender, Enfranchising the disenfranchised: should refugees receive political rights in liberal democracies?, Citizenship Studies, 2020.